| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Moderators: cmoy | Welcome. Please log in. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Registration is required to post a new topic or a reply.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#20] posted on: 08-11-2008 11:26 PM CST (US). The higher the source impedance (which includes the pot value at low settings), the higher the likelihood of noise, because a pot is a resistor, and some types of resistor noise is proportional to resistance (google "resistor noise" if you care). The choice of pot resistance is constrained by noise at one end, vs. loading the driving source excessively at the other end. I specified 10K to 50K ohms because that is the "sweet spot" range. However, in practice 100K works out fine in many builds, as long as the amp's gain isn't excessively high. |
| jeremy.ggg Member Joined: Jul. 27, 2008 | Message [#21] posted on: 08-12-2008 04:42 AM CST (US). 1. Would it be possible to build a "jumper" for the volume controls on the ε22 backplane for the β22 to simulate whatever benefits a stepped attenuator would offer? I don't expect to have volume control, I just want to know what things would sound like with the potentiometer taken out of the signal path. 2. The beta 22 is silent near the lowest and highest volumes, but there is a hiss through the middle range of the volume control. Might the pot be the source of this hiss? Thanks!!! [Edited by jeremy.ggg on 08-12-2008 at 05:12 AM.] |
| jeremy.ggg Member Joined: Jul. 27, 2008 | Message [#22] posted on: 08-12-2008 04:56 AM CST (US). Amb, I'm considering putting a USB Monica DAC into my 3 channel β22 enclosure. I am using a 30V σ22 with 100VA transformer. 1. What do you think the best power supply would be for the Monica? 2. Would it be a good idea to use the power from the σ22? If so, how might I accomplish it? There appears to be a good deal of performance variation based upon the power supply for the Monica. The Monica seems to accept a wide range of input voltage, at least 12VDC - 24VDC. This is the Monica: This is a remark on the Monica power supply: Thank you very much! [Edited by jeremy.ggg on 08-12-2008 at 05:10 AM.] |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#23] posted on: 08-12-2008 02:09 PM CST (US). jeremy.ggg, the web page you linked to is poorly organized and hard to find actual info, but it looks like the Monica DAC needs a single-rail 24VDC supply. I don't know what its current requirements are, but rather than tapping off the main σ22, I would probably build a separate power supply for it. A simple 7824 regulated based circuit would do, or if you want to get fancy, a σ11. That said, I prefer to keep the DAC and the amp in separate cases for flexibility and upgradability. In the future should you wish to upgrade to a better DAC, you don't have to take your amp apart. |
n_maher![]() ![]() HeadWize Fanatic Joined: Dec. 15, 2004 | Message [#24] posted on: 08-12-2008 02:47 PM CST (US). Ti, Just for clarification the Monica requires a single rail 12 to 18VDC power supply. Two more points about that - 1) as a former Monica owner and user I would recommend a different source for the beta22. The Monica is nice, but IMO not up to the level of performance of the beta22. 2) if you insist on using it I'd follow Ti's advice and house it in another enclosure for a whole host of reasons not the least of which is getting it away from any and all transformers so it doesn't pick up noise. |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#25] posted on: 08-12-2008 03:05 PM CST (US). Thanks Nate for the info. |
| izzyman Member Joined: Oct. 2, 2002 | Message [#26] posted on: 08-17-2008 11:08 PM CST (US). amb, I am considering using the b22 as a tweeter amp. It's a pure, true ribbon driver (over 5ft long) and has about a 5 ohm impedance, mostly resistive, I'm told. The importer says about 30 watts should be fine. If the b22 puts 18w into 8, it might work. Speaker link if you're curious: http://www.analysisaudiousa.com/omega.php My question is: will the b22 work safely into this load? I;m concerned with heat as well as safety/stability. Any thoughts would be appreciated [Edited by izzyman on 08-17-2008 at 11:11 PM.] |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#27] posted on: 08-18-2008 12:04 AM CST (US). izzyman, if that tweeter has reasonably high efficiency and your room is not huge, then the β22 should be a great amp for it. I assume you will be using an active electronic crossover before the amp, which will remove the tweeter amp from bearing any burden of amplifying the bass frequencies. The resistive nature of the tweeter impedance also helps to make it easier on the amp. Nevertheless, because this ribbon is large and could be crossed over at the low midrange, to ensure that the amp's MOSFETs do not overheat, you should use larger, offboard heatsinks as shown in the "board and heatsinks" section of the β22 website. |
| Audio Nut Member Joined: Feb. 12, 2008 | Message [#28] posted on: 08-21-2008 02:20 PM CST (US).
Just a quick update on the hiss problem: SOLVED! Got my parts in last week to take my B22 from 8 to 5 gain. This definitely cured 99% of the hiss between songs. My Denon AH-D5000's sound fantastic and for those who have low impedance headphones, you may want to build your B22 from the get go at 5 gain. Will save some time. Also, for those who haven't heard the Denon's, give them a listen if you get a chance. They sound great with this amp and are the best I've heard to date for dynamic headphones. Thanks again, AMB, for your help and support!! Tommy |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#29] posted on: 08-22-2008 02:59 AM CST (US). Audio Nut, congratulations. Why not post some pics of your new β22? |
| Audio Nut Member Joined: Feb. 12, 2008 | Message [#30] posted on: 08-22-2008 08:46 AM CST (US).
AMB, I guess I should, but it will probably never be cased up, as it's new home is in our master bedroom closet on top shelf along with the rest of my other headphone gear (preamp, component CD, etc..). Might bore some guys just seeing the populated PC boards with no enclosure! Another quick question. Do you need to go back in and check/adjust quiescent current after the amp has burned in for a particular # of hours? I set mine up originally to around 65 to 68mV. Not sure how many mA that corresponds to as I don't remember the formula. I felt the heatsinks, especially the outer 2, were gettting a little too hot. [Edited by Audio Nut on 08-22-2008 at 08:48 AM.] |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#31] posted on: 08-22-2008 01:35 PM CST (US). Yes, you should re-check the quiescent current after it ran for some time. This is hot-running amp, if your finger doesn't get burned while touching the heatsink then it's ok. If you have a way to measure the heatsink temperature, don't let it exceed 65-70°C. |
| izzyman Member Joined: Oct. 2, 2002 | Message [#32] posted on: 08-22-2008 08:23 PM CST (US).
Thanks for the reply. I would NEVER consider anything but offboard heatsinks for this application. It'll be crossed over at 650Hz at 6db/octave, passively. Efficiency is low at 86db. |
| helzerr Member Joined: Jul. 11, 2003 | Message [#33] posted on: 08-25-2008 05:23 AM CST (US).
I just completed the electronic assembly of a three-channel β22, shorting R9 to ground during setup was the only problem I encountered during the build. Thankfully, it was the ground channel, so I was able to proceed with testing and auditioning the rest of the amp. Perhaps a future revision of the PCB could include test point pads for the setup measurements? Unfortunately, my source exhibits 4.5 mV DC offset. Since I currently intend to use the amplifier solely with this source, I've simply used the β22's offset trimmers to null the DC. Any recommendations for a DC offset correction servo circuit, or should I just go with DC blocking capacitors? So far, the results are spectacular! Thanks again, AMB, for sharing this quality project with the D.I.Y. community! |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#34] posted on: 08-25-2008 12:01 PM CST (US). helzerr, what kind of source are you using? If there is room inside, the right way to fix this is to add quality coupling capacitors at the output of the source (fix the problem where it occurs). If that is impossible, then add the coupling caps at the input jacks of your amp. That said 4.5mV is not too bad, and it will become more than 4.5mV at the amp's output only when you turn the volume knob over a certain position (where the attenuation is equal to the gain of the amp). Most headphones will be fine at DC offset levels even higher than that. As for test points on the PCB, it probably won't happen but builders should invest in a set of DMM meter probes with mini-grabber clip ends. These will prove to be useful for all kinds of other projects as well, and in some cases critical for safety (such as in high voltage circuits). See the following article: As for DC servo circuit, that is also unlikely to be added. Normally a DC servo is used as a self-corrective mechanism to eliminate the offset adjustment phase of the build, and to compensate for offset drift due to thermal changes. It is not really intended to null externally-induced offset (such as from the source). The β22 should experience negligible thermal offset drift. [Edited by amb on 08-25-2008 at 12:05 PM.] |
| helzerr Member Joined: Jul. 11, 2003 | Message [#35] posted on: 08-25-2008 12:34 PM CST (US). The source is a M-Audio Revolution 7.1 PC sound card. While testing, I'm using the source as the volume control, amplifier gain is 5 so I get about 20 mV at the output. I'll go with capacitors on the input until such time as I upgrade to an external USB DAC or similar instead of the sound card. I used to have oscilloscope probes with the mini-grabber clip ends, back when I had a fully equipped lab. I suppose I ought to invest in a pair for the DMM. I naively assumed the solder resist mask would prevent shorting to the ground plane. [edit] One replacement Q25, and all is well with my ground channel module. [/edit] [Edited by helzerr on 08-28-2008 at 06:41 PM.] |
| Sid Member Joined: Aug. 29, 2008 | Message [#36] posted on: 08-29-2008 09:14 AM CST (US). What is the recommended wiring to use for a 3-board headphone amplifier (using an E22 backplane) that should also function as a pre-amp? |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#37] posted on: 08-29-2008 12:02 PM CST (US).
See the "Other options" section of the β22 website. Pay special attention to the fact that the pre-out jacks' ground should be connected to the input signal ground, not the active output ground. |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#38] posted on: 08-29-2008 12:29 PM CST (US). I posted this on the other forum and thought I'd also duplicate it here because it is of general interest for those who have or plan to build a 4-channel balanced β22 amp. The standard 4-channel configuration has two 3-pin XLR balanced inputs, which requires the use of a source with balanced outputs. Indeed the balanced β22 maintains the balanced operation from the the input to the transducers only when used with a balanced source. Sometimes you may want to connect a source that only has unbalanced outputs (e.g., a CD player, tape deck or whatever). This is where an extra set of unbalanced RCA input jacks and a unbalanced/balanced selector switch comes in handy. But since the balanced β22 will accept only balanced inputs, before you could switch anything, you need to convert the unbalanced source' signal to balanced. This is because the inverted "cold" signal for each channel is missing. An active unbalanced-to-balanced line driver circuit (based on something like the DRV134 chip), or a passive transformer made for this purpose (from Lundahl, Jensen, Cinemag and others) must be used in order to derive that signal. This will then allow the balanced headphones to remain "balanced" (i.e., hot and cold signals of oposite phase at each end of its drivers). Both the active circuit and the passive transformer solutions have their own benefits and drawbacks. They both add distortion, and they add complexity. Here's an alternative, quick and easy way to add switchable balanced/unbalanced inputs to a 4-ch balanced β22 amp. It adds just a 4PDT switch (or two DPDTs) and some wiring. No extra circuitry or transformer necessary. This scheme could also be used on almost any 4-ch balanced amps. Note that when switched to unbalanced inputs, the - amps have their inputs grounded, so that they become active ground buffers similar to a 3-channel active-ground amp (except in this case there is a separate ground amp per channel). In this mode, the "balanced" headphones are actually driven with unbalanced signals, only the + terminals of the headphone transducers "see" a varying signal. The - terminal is held to zero volts.
[Edited by amb on 08-29-2008 at 12:31 PM.] |
set300b![]() HeadWizer Joined: Aug. 1, 2001 | Message [#39] posted on: 08-29-2008 05:00 PM CST (US).
You might want to include this on your B22 website. [Edited by set300b on 08-29-2008 at 05:01 PM.] |
amb![]() ![]() ![]() Headphone Council Joined: Apr. 1, 2004 | Message [#40] posted on: 08-29-2008 11:26 PM CST (US).
Yes, I will. |
| Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> | Next Page | Prev Topic | Next Topic | ||||
![]() (remove _nospam_ ) |
© Chu Moy, 2001.