Moderators: cmoy     Welcome. Please log in

Registration is required to post a new topic or a reply.
User action bar

 Forum:

New Topic Reply to Topic Search Forums
-
 DIY Workshop » The SOHA - A New Hybrid Amplifier   
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> | Next Page | Prev Topic | Next Topic
AuthorPost

mains_hum



HeadWize Fanatic

Joined: Aug. 19, 2003
Locale: UK
Total Posts: 591

Edit Message Message [#100] posted on: 11-12-2005 11:28 AM CST (US).    View Profile for mains_hum   Send PM  to mains_hum   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
The transformer ( RS part 201-7038 ) is made by Block
The RS site says its 26% regulation, yet that's not what the Farnell site says ... they reckon 69% regulation.
Why might this matter ? ... in normal use it won't.
But, if you power up the supply without the valve heater load B+ will sting if you touch it and 63V caps are a bit "iffy" if the 69% is correct whereas if 26% then the caps are OK.

Why don't we just say that all 100uF are 100V rating ?
Any PCB mount 0-15-0-15 transformer will then work and not be a problem no matter what the transformer regulation, also, caps are often supplied in packs of 5, so it helps in component type count too.

Just a hint to you builders out there.... while I put together the parts for my "Cool Stoopid" ... coming soon ....

[Edited by mains_hum on 11-12-2005 at 11:29 AM.]

runeight



Headphone Council

Joined: Mar. 8, 2002
Locale: Austin, Texas
Total Posts: 1879

Edit Message Message [#101] posted on: 11-12-2005 12:18 PM CST (US).    View Profile for runeight   Send PM  to runeight   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
OK, I've changed all of the basic diagrams to use 100V caps.
Blooze



HeadWizer

Joined: Jun. 28, 2005
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: 194

Edit Message Message [#102] posted on: 11-13-2005 09:30 PM CST (US).    View Profile for Blooze   Send PM  to Blooze   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Out of curiosity, are there any opinions about how the SOHA sounds compared to Sijosae's hybrid amp? I was thinking about building one or the other and they both look like excellent designs and would make a nice amp to use at work as well as being cost effective.
runeight



Headphone Council

Joined: Mar. 8, 2002
Locale: Austin, Texas
Total Posts: 1879

Edit Message Message [#103] posted on: 11-13-2005 10:42 PM CST (US).    View Profile for runeight   Send PM  to runeight   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
It's hard to know without hearing both and since I'm one of the designers of the SOHA, I don't want to cheerlead for the SOHA too much, but am looking forward to the results that other builders will get.

Mains and Batman did some testing on the SOHA with their prototypes. We purposely created the design to have a higher B+ on the tube because this where we believed the most improvement in the sound would come from.

Batman has posted that when his B+ was around 20V or less the amp did not sound very good but that as he boosted the B+ to 40V the amp began to sound very good. In fact, it was equal to the sound of the CJ amp that he had. Mains has gotten similar listening results.

So, if the design principle behind the SOHA is correct (raising the tube's B+), then it is likely that it will sound better than amps where tubes are running at 12-20V. Mains' and Batman's seem to verify this.

They may have some additional comments.

Blooze



HeadWizer

Joined: Jun. 28, 2005
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: 194

Edit Message Message [#104] posted on: 11-13-2005 11:00 PM CST (US).    View Profile for Blooze   Send PM  to Blooze   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Thanks Runeight. I would think it would start to run more linear as you increased the B+, getting it a little out of the curve at the low end and eliminating some distortion that might be present.

I may just have missed this in the posts, but is there a parts list made up for the SOHA? I also remember reading about a wiring diagram (I can do schematics, though it's always nice to be able to double check with a wiring diagram that everything is "in it's place". I see that transformers are mentioned, but is there any reason that a regulated wart couldn't be used here?
I'm just full of newbie questions, huh?

It will be nice to give this a try and compare it to my Millett I'm finishing up.

runeight



Headphone Council

Joined: Mar. 8, 2002
Locale: Austin, Texas
Total Posts: 1879

Edit Message Message [#105] posted on: 11-13-2005 11:12 PM CST (US).    View Profile for runeight   Send PM  to runeight   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Yes, that was our thinking too. The more you can lift the B+ the more linear the tube will get. OTOH, increasing B+ too high misses the point of a hybrid amp. 40V seems to be a good sounding compromise.

I don't think that anyone has created a parts list yet. Or a wiring diagram.

When you say regulated Walwart, do you mean one with a DC output? If so, then this wouldn't work. The key part of the design is the voltage multiplier in the PS and this depends on having access to the secondary of the trafo.

Batman is designing a PCB. This might be ready in a few days to a week. Hopefully he can find time to post here soon.

eric.w


Headphone Council

Joined: N/A
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: N/A

Edit Message Message [#106] posted on: 11-13-2005 11:16 PM CST (US).    View Profile for eric.w   Send PM  to eric.w   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
If you used a wallwart it would have to be an AC output one, with a center tap connection, which are probably rare. Regulated DC won't work because the voltage doubler needs AC.

[Edited by eric.w on 11-13-2005 at 11:17 PM.]

Blooze



HeadWizer

Joined: Jun. 28, 2005
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: 194

Edit Message Message [#107] posted on: 11-13-2005 11:23 PM CST (US).    View Profile for Blooze   Send PM  to Blooze   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
I was thinking an AC wart with decent regulation compared to it's stated specs. Sorry.

I've never done a PCB, but maybe this would be a good time to learn how. Or I could just continue to do p-2-p. Or maybe I could bribe someone to make me a PCB. LOL!

The SOHA would work out quite well for me as I have a stack of old 12AU7's and their variants laying around. I've been collecting tubes here and there as I've come into them over the last 3-4 months in preparation for many years of pursuing this hobby. These low voltage designs are just what a guy learning needs to get his feet wet and I surely appreciate everyone's taking the time to design these amps.

[Edited by Blooze on 11-13-2005 at 11:24 PM.]

Blooze



HeadWizer

Joined: Jun. 28, 2005
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: 194

Edit Message Message [#108] posted on: 11-13-2005 11:37 PM CST (US).    View Profile for Blooze   Send PM  to Blooze   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Did a quick search and the largest warts I could find were 16VAC that were center tapped. I've not dealt with AC adapters so I wasn't sure, but they are pretty scarce I guess. Tranny it is!
eric.w


HeadWizer

Joined: N/A
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: N/A

Edit Message Message [#109] posted on: 11-14-2005 01:03 AM CST (US).    View Profile for eric.w   Send PM  to eric.w   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Oh ok, sorry, I misunderstood you too.. <smile> Yeah, I love how the parts for this amp are cheap and common! From the leftovers of a multi-hybrid, plus some previous projects, and some 200V capacitors from switching power supplies, I should have everything I need to build one <big grin>
mains_hum



HeadWize Fanatic

Joined: Aug. 19, 2003
Locale: UK
Total Posts: 591

Edit Message Message [#110] posted on: 11-14-2005 01:05 PM CST (US).    View Profile for mains_hum   Send PM  to mains_hum   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Yes!, a tranny it should be.
A Walwart 16Vac CT won't do, whereas a 15-0-15 Vac or 15-0-15-0 Vac is just what's needed. 6VA is the minimum rating so don't forget this power aspect.
Still, a suitable tranny is (or ought to be) cheap and that was one of the design goals.

And yes, the design is meant to be something that sounds pretty good without any lethal voltages so folk can "get their feet wet" and check out the "tube sound"

Blooze



HeadWizer

Joined: Jun. 28, 2005
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: 194

Edit Message Message [#111] posted on: 11-15-2005 11:10 AM CST (US).    View Profile for Blooze   Send PM  to Blooze   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Has anyone tried the TSH22IN opamp from Mouser as a replacement for the 2134? I've used ST's opamps for replacements for the 2132 in Cmoys before with no problems, although this replacement may be a different beast all together.
runeight



Headphone Council

Joined: Mar. 8, 2002
Locale: Austin, Texas
Total Posts: 1879

Edit Message Message [#112] posted on: 11-15-2005 11:19 AM CST (US).    View Profile for runeight   Send PM  to runeight   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
For the most part this opamp can sub for the 2134. But in this amp, because it is a bipolar opamp, it will have lower input impedance than the fet-input opamps. This will increase the loading on the tube and increase the distortion.

But, since it seems to be pin compatible no reason you can't just pop it in and listen. Maybe it will sound better. <smile>

eVITAERC


Headphone Council

Joined: N/A
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: N/A

Edit Message Message [#113] posted on: 11-16-2005 08:02 AM CST (US).    View Profile for eVITAERC   Send PM  to eVITAERC   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Had anyone here built a Millet Hybrid as well? How is the sound of using "normal" tubes compared to those 12v counterparts?
Blooze



HeadWizer

Joined: Jun. 28, 2005
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: 194

Edit Message Message [#114] posted on: 11-16-2005 08:42 AM CST (US).    View Profile for Blooze   Send PM  to Blooze   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!

quote:

[By eVITAERC] Had anyone here built a Millet Hybrid as well? How is the sound of using "normal" tubes compared to those 12v counterparts?


I've built the Millett and am curious as to how they will compare also. I think the Millett sounds great and you can roll in a couple of different tubes for slightly different sounds. Speaking of rolling tubes, I've got some E81L's that are very cool looking that I would like to find out if they'd work triode strapped in a circuit such as the SOHA. You'd have to put one for each channel and do some PS changes I would think, but it has some nice curves when used as a triode.

If someone has the inclination to check, I've doodled out some wiring schemes for the SOHA.
http://pg.photos...m/ph//my_photos

ericj



HeadWize Fanatic

Joined: Aug. 1, 2005
Locale: Orem, UT
Total Posts: 467

Edit Message Message [#115] posted on: 11-16-2005 11:51 AM CST (US).    View Profile for ericj   Send PM  to ericj   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!

quote:

[By Blooze] Has anyone tried the TSH22IN opamp from Mouser as a replacement for the 2134? I've used ST's opamps for replacements for the 2132 in Cmoys before with no problems, although this replacement may be a different beast all together.



I've used the TS522IN - it's slower, cheaper, "low noise" brother.

(Edit: Not in a SOHA, in another project. no new amp projects until my M3 is enclosed, which has been severely set back by circumstances beyond my control)

It's a real nice little chip for the 68 cents paid. The faster version oughta be a peach.

[Edited by ericj on 11-16-2005 at 11:57 AM.]

jbloudg20


HeadWize Fanatic

Joined: N/A
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: N/A

Edit Message Message [#116] posted on: 11-17-2005 12:03 AM CST (US).    View Profile for jbloudg20   Send PM  to jbloudg20   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Does anyone have a Bill of Materials they would like to share?
Guitarsenal


HeadWize Fanatic

Joined: N/A
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: N/A

Edit Message Message [#117] posted on: 11-17-2005 01:18 AM CST (US).    View Profile for Guitarsenal   Send PM  to Guitarsenal   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Blooze,

There may be a mistake in your power supply drawing. You are putting the entire power supply after the filimant dropping resistors. That might be a bad thing.

Guitarsenal


HeadWize Fanatic

Joined: N/A
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: N/A

Edit Message Message [#118] posted on: 11-17-2005 01:26 AM CST (US).    View Profile for Guitarsenal   Send PM  to Guitarsenal   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
I just ordered this stuff from Mouser, but I'm kind of new to this so check my list carefully! Also, I have some caps here that aren't part of the SOHA and are intended for building a Meier natural crossfeed circuit.

I am ordering a nice ALPS pot from Tangent, and I'll probably hit up Digi-Key for a better opamp...

~~~~~~~~~

Mouser
553-FP30-200 FP30-200 Triad Magnetics Flat Pack Transformers
30VCT@.2A 15V@.4A 6.0 VA 1 $11.990 $11.99 Data Pending Update

781-J113 J113 Vishay/Siliconix N-Channel FETs
TO-92 55V 2mA 8 $0.420 $3.36 Data Pending Update

511-L78L12ABD L78L12ABD ST Voltage Regulators
SO-8 12V 0.1A Positive 4 $0.400 $1.60 Data Pending Update

511-L79L12ACZ L79L12ACZ ST Voltage Regulators
TO-92 12V 0.1A Negative - RoHS/Pb-FREE per producer documentation 4 $0.280 $1.12 Data Pending Update

511-TSH22IN TSH22IN ST Operational Amplifiers
DIP-8 Dual Hi-Performance 2 $1.100 $2.20 Data Pending Update

652-3296W-1-202 3296W-1-202 Bourns Multi-Turn Trimmer Potentiometers
BULK 3/8\" 2Kohms Sealed Vertical Adjust - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 4 $2.200 $8.80 Data Pending Update

581-BF014D0104J BF014D0104J-- AVX Multi-Layer Film Capacitors
63V 0.1uF 5% - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 10 $0.120 $1.20 Data Pending Update

581-BF014D0224J BF014D0224J-- AVX Multi-Layer Film Capacitors
63V 0.22uF 5% - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 10 $0.170 $1.70 Data Pending Update

581-BF074D0474J BF074D0474J-- AVX Multi-Layer Film Capacitors
63V 0.47uF 5% - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 10 $0.250 $2.50 Data Pending Update

75-515D16V47 515D476M016JA6A Vishay/Sprague Radial Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors - 85 Degree
RADIAL CAP 16V 47 - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 10 $0.130 $1.30 Data Pending Update

75-515D35V470 515D477M035CG6A Vishay/Sprague Radial Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors - 85 Degree
RADIAL CAP 35V 470 - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 4 $0.500 $2.00 Data Pending Update

282-100 282-100 Xicon 2W 5% Small Metal Oxide Resistors
100ohms 5% Tol - RoHS/Pb-FREE per producer documentation 10 $0.190 $1.90 Data Pending Update

282-220 282-220 Xicon 2W 5% Small Metal Oxide Resistors
220ohms 5% Tol - RoHS/Pb-FREE per producer documentation 10 $0.190 $1.90 Data Pending Update

75-515D16V1000 515D108M016CG6A Vishay/Sprague Radial Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors - 85 Degree
RADIAL CAP 16V 1000 - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 4 $0.500 $2.00 Data Pending Update

833-1N4148 1N4148 MCC Rectifiers - Switching
DO-35 100V Io/150mA BULK 10 $0.050 $0.50 Data Pending Update

75-515D100V100 515D107M100DG6A Vishay/Sprague Radial Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors - 85 Degree
RADIAL CAP 100V 100 - RoHS non-compliant/CONTAINS Pb 10 $0.600 $6.00 Data Pending Update

161-R301SN 161-R301SN Kobiconn AC Connectors
IEC C14 SCREW/SOLDER 2 $0.790 $1.58 Data Pending Update

633-HB16CKW01 HB16CKW01 NKK Pushbutton Switches
SPDT ON-ON RND - RoHS/Pb-FREE per producer documentation 1 $6.450 $6.45 Data Pending Update

108-2MD1T1B1M1QE 108-2MD1T1B1M1QE Mountain Switch Ultra-Miniature Toggle Switches
DPDT ON-ON SOLDER 2 $3.570 $7.14 Data Pending Update


[Edited by Guitarsenal on 11-17-2005 at 01:27 AM.]

runeight



Headphone Council

Joined: Mar. 8, 2002
Locale: Austin, Texas
Total Posts: 1879

Edit Message Message [#119] posted on: 11-17-2005 08:34 AM CST (US).    View Profile for runeight   Send PM  to runeight   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!
Blooze, Guitarsenal is correct. You have the entire PS coming after the filament droppers. Only the filmanent comes after these resistors. The rest of the PS should be connected directly to the trafo secondary. It's a simple rewiring on your diagram.

Guitarsenal the parts list looks right assuming that you have the resistors not listed. <smile>

[Edited by runeight on 11-17-2005 at 08:39 AM.]

Blooze



HeadWizer

Joined: Jun. 28, 2005
Locale: N/A
Total Posts: 194

Edit Message Message [#120] posted on: 11-17-2005 08:37 AM CST (US).    View Profile for Blooze   Send PM  to Blooze   |  Quote Message in Reply  |  Report SPAM!

quote:

[By Guitarsenal] Blooze,

There may be a mistake in your power supply drawing. You are putting the entire power supply after the filimant dropping resistors. That might be a bad thing.


Good call! Can't believe I missed that. That's why I like to have stuff checked first.

Let's try again:

http://pg.photos...inger/my_photos

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> | Next Page | Prev Topic | Next Topic
New Topic Reply to Topic Search Forums
post new topic post reply post new topic
Site navigation bar
Contact Webmaster - HeadWize welcomes comments and suggestions!
(remove _nospam_ )

© Chu Moy, 2001.

HeadWize Homepage Announcements & News Library Forums Homepage Directory FAQs HeadWize Store Registration Profiles and Account Services Private Messaging View Bookmarked Topics Forums Help